# Graphology Handwriting Analysis 3 The Zones

The definitive Swiss graphologist Max Pulver (1889-1952) formed the outline beneath, showing a large number of the focuses examined in the past part. Be that as it may, as well as showing incline, it additionally exhibits the zones.

If we somehow happened to superimpose a composed word with a t in it on the spot stamped I (Ego) Present, and the t corresponded with the straight unpredictable line, we would discuss an upward essayist. Assuming the t went to one side, we see from the diagram that it would highlight what’s to come. Were it to go to one side, it would highlight the past. Be that as it may, this equivalent word-say, “level”- additionally ventures into an upper and lower aspect. Upper, center, and lower regions are called aspect zones, and they make up the zonal region.

Consider a youngster’s drawing-a kid remaining on a land parcel, the sun sparkling and a few mists above. Zones are something to that effect picture. The upper zone addresses sky, mists, the sun likewise what is high, otherworldly, strict, elevated. On the other hand, the lower zone addresses earth, robustness, what is underneath things that are essential, normal, gritty, materialistic, sexual. The center zone is the individual, the inner self, the me.

While penmanship is transcendently in one zone, we see a strong key to character. Penmanship bound to the center zone shows the social individual, the today individual, the one worried about Number One and lacking profound as well as actual drive.

Picture “level” spread out on a zonal diagram; each zone is 3 millimeters in level, which is the standard.

Assuming the remainder of the composing is reliably in similar zones, we say there is balance in this author. Where the zones vary, the graphologist hopes to see what the progressions are and breaks down them. In the event that the essayist continually changes the point of his composition, we see a touchy individual, problematic in his responses. Where the zones change, it demonstrates a change in inspiration.

Take, for example, the instance of a man whose upper-zone composing commonly midpoints three millimeters in level the standard. Out of nowhere, the upper zone decreases to a normal of one millimeter. This addresses a moving away from desires, otherworldliness as propelling elements. Typically such a change is joined by expanded size in one of the other two zones, as though the energy regularly used in the profound zone has been moved to the self image or sexual zones.

As well as composing that reliably covers all zones and composing where there is no consistency at all, we have six different mixes of zonal regions:

The upper zone as the biggest. This uncovers an individual with high goals yet too little interest in public activity, since he has a somewhat little lower zone. Despite the fact that he endeavors toward significant standards, it is dicey assuming he will accomplish them, since he needs endurance.

High yearning combined with actual endurance is confirmed by both the upper and lower zones being enormous. Be that as it may, since his center zone is very contracted, his treatment of regular undertakings might be off, and thusly the two positive parts of his personality may not produce their legitimate results.
A little upper zone shows that the essayist most likely has little otherworldliness and barely any desires. His center zone is normal, which uncovers a typical public activity, but since the complement in this essayist’s content is on the lower zone, we see somebody who is engrossed with actual delights. On the off chance that the lower zone circle is long and straight down, it is the indication of sexual delight; assuming the lower zone circle is expanded, it shows cash, realism.

One of the best of all heavyweight fighters, the “champion among champions,” Jack Dempsey shows by his unique extraordinary actual joy and much actual interest. His long, weighty, lower-zone structures-this sort of composing is normally found among super competitors.

The saddest picture is maybe that of an essayist whose content appears to have everything except an upper zone, and who consequently has neither creative mind nor standards, neither scholarly interests nor desires, no genuine pride, no morals and, I try to say, no cerebrums.